f4 full frame vs f2 8 crop

So an f2.8 lens on a full frame camera will have a much creamier background than the same lens on a crop sensor. I’m wanting a better lens for landscape/architecture photography as I’m going on a road trip soon where there’ll be some scenic landscapes. I am in the position where I can choose to shoot on a full frame with a lens that is f4 or I can choose a cropped sensor with f2.8 will they be the same (due to equivalency)? In my case, as mentioned above, x1.6 crop factor. I do not have the 17-55 F2.8 but if you want to compare this link may help. F/4 is one stop less than f/2.8. But I do think that I could use the wider f2.8 on a 70-200 or a 24-70 sometimes as the low light is a touch restrictive inside, even at higher ISO's. ... will they be the same (due to equivalency)? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the Beginning_Photography community, Continue browsing in r/Beginning_Photography. Full frame on crop body? Discussion in 'Canon EOS' started by anuragagnihotri, Apr 21, 2010. anuragagnihotri. But from all I've tested adapters aren't good enough so I would need native lenses. The exposure time will be the same for both though. The new Nikon Z 24-200mm f4.0-6.3 VR performed very well in this long-distance test although up to 50mm focal length the Nikon Z 24-70mm f4.0 S is sharper right up into the extreme corners of a full-frame sensor. Do they both have IS/VR as this will make a huge difference. Aperture doesn't mean much by itself. Is the full frame cameras iso performance 1 stop better than the crop sensor camera? No, they won't be the same. Also full frame is usually better in any field photography-wise, but the negatives come from added costs and weight. I find I use my 16-35 F2.8 II a lot more on my 7D than my 24-70 F2.8. F1.8 on FF is f1.8). Press J to jump to the feed. Related Comparisons: Samsung 18-55 vs. Sony E.16-50 Sharpness at 50mm. So on that note, if you are one of those who say things like “give it some bokeh”, then you need to stop. A 2.8 24mm lens will have worse bokeh than an f4 70 200 at 200. Crop + F2.8 v Full Frame + F4. I currently shoot Canon APS-C, which comes along with a 1.6x crop factor. Hi. I have shot with both systems for a couple years but never side by side. Cancel … As you can see the 24-70 on full frame (1DsIII) and the 17-55 on a 50D show very clear differences. I know it's a weird question but diving into everything would make this a longish short story so I hope you can give me some guidance based on these facts . One of the main nudges for crop sensor shooters to jump to full frame is because of the larger control over DOF and low light performance. From what i … Not to mention the bokeh possible on FF is shallower than crop (f1.8 on crop is about f2.8. Before I got the job I didn't use autofocus, but I in my new job I do event photography, so sometimes dimly lit and some movement. At regular close-focus distance at 70mm on full-frame, Canon 24-70 f/4 IS. Crop Sensor: A crop sensor camera, like on many DSLRs (which use the APS-C size) or the Four Thirds sensor (used in Four Thirds DSLRs and Micro 4/3 mirrorless cameras), is simply a sensor that is smaller in physical size than a full frame sensor. The big benefit to FF re: low light is primarily much larger "pixels" on the sensor, which can gather more light. Still have a couple of weeks before the return window closes. The Tamron 28-200mm f2.8-5.6 Di III again fared very well too but was more neck-and-neck with Nikon’s 24-200mm zoom lens than in the close-distance test. are all the same. Why? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Hi. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. This is a subreddit to discuss new cameras and camera comparisons, camera lenses, gear and accessories. Taking a look at one of the most common questions that I get asked - is it okay to use APS-C lenses on your full frame Sony camera? Full frame usually has better high iso capabilities, so the smaller aperture shouldn't do much bad. One of the main nudges for crop sensor shooters to jump to full frame is because of the larger control over DOF and low light performance. Compared to the Sony FE 12-24mm F4 G, and to the Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN Art. The Sony GM is as its best between 18- 24mm whereas 24mm is the weakest on both Sony FE 12-24mm F4 G, and the Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN Art Assuming similar settings. And actually a little worse? I am considering either buying a Sony 18-105 f4 because I need the zoom capabilities and it fits in my budget. With a zoom, the perspectiv… If it's a crop sensor, I prefer F2.8, because it provides the FF equivalent of F4 in terms of DoF and Bokeh. It depends on everything you've left out. Well, depends a bit on what you're planning to shoot. Are you shooting shots where you need f2. To put it bluntly- if you are looking to buy a full frame rated lens to use on your crop sensor camera, as long as it is compatible for your brand and mount, the full frame lens will take the exact same photo as a crop sensor lens insofar as the focal length, aperture, lighting, etc. Sony 18-105mm F4 G lens vs Sony 28-70mm f3.5-5.6 FE Aiur Productions. As a mostly full-frame shooter, I’d prefer the Canon 15mm f/2.8 fisheye prime lens unless of course I started grabbing a crop-body more often. I'm currently shooting a Sony a7ii and I have received two lenses from my work (tameron 24-70 f2.8 Canon mount and Canon 50mm f1.8). But, I don't know their focal lengths or conditions of the shoot. Full Frame: A full frame camera has a sensor that is the same physical size as that of a frame of 35mm film.That is, 36mm wide x 24mm high. You can 'compensate' for the crop factor by zooming out some more with your feet (walking further away from your subject). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_factor. Taking into consideration that a 400mm f2.8 (for example) on an 1.5x crop sensor would have an effective FOV as a 600mm lens but would also have an effective aperture of f4 with an ISO degradation of approx 1 stop (or conversely 1 stop slower Shutter time) it would make it almost the same settings as the FF sensor with a TC. Post reviews, articles, and videos of products, unboxings, etc. Sensor performance, DOF, low light? EVIL, SLR, DSLR, point and shoot, rangefinder, mirrorless, handheld cams etc. Given that these are the equivalent 35mm measurements, what would the main difference be between a full frame and an APS-C camera with respect to DOF, low light, etc? If you'll be shooting in low light conditions, or if you have to shoot things that move really fast, I'd recommend the 2.8. You can not “zoom with your feet”, because if you change your position, your perspective changes. I like it so far, but still need to do FM decenter test. In my experience, the depth of field of an f4 lens on full frame is about the same as f2.8 on crop. Loading... Unsubscribe from Aiur Productions? Sony PZ E 18-105mm F4 G OSS on a full frame; Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM; Sony FE 24-70mm F4 Zeiss OSS; Sony FE 24-105 F4 G OSS; Sony FE 24-240mm F3.5-F6.3; Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 (Kit lens) Sony FE PZ 28-135mm F4 G OSS; Sony FE 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS; Sony FE70-200 F2.8 GM & TC1.4 / TC2.0; Sony FE 100-400mm GM OSS F4.5-F5.6; Sony FE 70-200 F4 G But my hesitation was, would the 2.8 tamerons low light capabilities be canceled by the crop factor and would I be better just to keep my Sony and buy a f4 lens. Thread starter akr; Start date Sep 18, 2011; Prev. F1.8 on FF is f1.8) TLDR: APS-C f2.8 vs FF f4… A recent example of something I shot was last weekend. Knee jerk is to favour the faster lens (f/2.8). Depth of field should be as you expect -- about on par with a 28-80 f/4 lens. What that means is that, although your lens’ focal lengths and apertures are accurate, your cameras 35mm equivalent focal lengths and apertures should be multiplied by that crop factor. A full frame camera with good high iso performance will be better for indoor than a crop sensor. **READ THIS BEFORE POSTING** Sort by "HOT" and you'll see a "READ HERE FIRST" post pinned to the top of the sub. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. hi, have psted couple of threads asking various things about lenses....i'm considering 70-200 F4...and i want to know the difference between background blur when its mounted on a crop body vis a vis a full frame body. Here's a crop from this 22MP image at 100%: Crop from above image at 100%, shot at f/8 at ISO 100 on a 5D Mark III. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Are they the same focal length? My only other experience with UW is Canon EF-S 10-18 on crop sensor Canons (so about 16 - 28 equivalent on full frame). And I have found that I need autofocus. f2.8 is much heavier than an f4; f2.8 is much more expensive than f4; An f4 lens with VR will actually be able to shoot in darker conditions than an f2.8 without VR. APS-C vs FF. 8? So, READ IT! It was a 10 year olds playing a flag football game at night.

Ficus Tree Sap, Air King 9012, Kb Homes Color Schemes, Nikon D5600 Sale, Gyrfalcon Technology Ai, Writing Styles Examples, Ap Literature And Composition Vocabulary List, Evolution Of Tqm, Digital Weighing Machine For Gas Cylinder,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.